Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Europeans are Terrified of American food!

Look how terrified Europeans are of American food!  The following is a reaction by the E.U. to a trade deal that opens up the importing of American foods/meat to the E.U.

From the Washington Post:
"In October, tens of thousands of people from 22 E.U. countries took to the streets to protest the deal... 
Even in Britain — a nation hardly known for the glories of its national cuisine — fear and loathing of modified American foods, and the trade deal in general, appear to be running surprisingly strong...
'It's possibly one of the most dangerous agreements,' the British TV chef Jamie Oliver told the Times of London. He added: 'We don't have hormones in our meat; that's banned. But not over there. We don't have hundreds of poisons and pesticides that have been proven to be carcinogenic. They do.'"

We are lagging behind the rest of the world:  We still have BPA in our cans while these are banned in Canadian cans.  Only a few states label GMOs while they are completely banned in many countries in Europe.  (Think about how poisonous something must be to get banned--such as DDT and Agent Orange.)

According to Oxfam, by 2016 1% of the population will control 99% of the world's wealth. There is big money in pesticide-hormone factory farming, as well as the selling of GMO seeds by companies like Monsanto.  Until we take back our country from big corporations, this situation will continue.

Many Americans can't even name common foods that are genetically modified.  (Canola Oil, corn, corn oil, cottonseed oil, soy, soy lecithin.)  They are not aware of numerous studies showing the health risks of GMOs. 

By the way, there is not such thing as a Canola plant. The word Canola comes from the hybrid of the words "Canada" and "oil."  Canola oil comes from the rapeseed plant, which is so toxic that it kills farm animals, and rapeseed oil is only used on farm equipment.

The Gates foundation gives GMO seeds to poor farmers in third world countries, who cannot afford to buy them year after year, the seeds destroy the soil, and GMO crops do not ultimately yield greater amounts of crops. 

Why would the Gates foundation do this when every major NGO says not to give poor farmers GMO seeds?!  When Bill Gates started giving away GMO seeds, he simultaneously invested a lot of money in Monsanto, --when his foundation donates these seeds, his Monsanto stock goes up. 

An example of how these seeds affect poor third world farmers:  GMO cotton crops failed to produce promised yields in India resulting in mass suicides (between 10,000-30,000 people) of Indian farmers. 

The reason for all this ignorance in America is the difficulty for the media to report on anything about GMOs or vaccines resulting in autism, or the ills of the food industry because their ads will be pulled.

Also, it takes time for the general public to even accept that the food they eat is toxic--including the fluoride in tap water, which is a neurotoxin.  Hence, NYC has a proposition to eliminate fluoride in their drinking water. 

Hopefully more and more people will join the grass roots movement for holistic health and awareness about the food industry.  Blogs like this, people like Joseph Mercola, and the outcropping of holistic health coaches are part of a larger movement to raise awareness about the food crisis in America.

A Votre Sante (Here's To Your Health) Alix


Wednesday, September 24, 2014

Agent orange ingredient in pesticide

Along with the current outcry for the EPA to reject a new stronger pesticide with ingredients similar to agent orange, current air-sprayed pesticides are blamed for being lethal:

A man died after being doused with a pesticide by a helicopter attempting to spray nearby crops--it is not uncommon for people to be accidentally sprayed with a pesticide.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/09/23/oregon-colorado-gmo-labeling-fight.aspx?e_cid=20140923Z1_DNL_art_1&utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20140923Z1&et_cid=DM56424&et_rid=669055435

Now that we have super-weeds and another pesticide with similar ingredients to agent orange is being pushed by Dow.   Hopefully the public opposition will sway the EPA to reject it.

A Votre Sante (Here's To Your Health,) Alix

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Fragrance Sensitivity

 
 
"Being forced to breathe in others' fragrance choices is a lot like being forced to breathe in secondhand smoke," Dalton tells WebMD. "It's a loss of control over your personal environment, and for some it can have serious personal health consequences."
And that is precisely the logic behind several recent legal actions aimed at cleaning up our personal air space.
  • In July 2007, a government worker from Detroit sued her employers under the Americans With Disabilities Act for what her lawsuit claims is "fragrance toxicity" in the workplace. Her claim: Exposures to fragrances also means increased exposure to chemical neurotoxins that adversely impact brain function. The suit is pending.
  • In the fall of 2007, a group of students from California State University, Stanislaus, became so concerned about these same chemical exposures they asked campus officials to institute a fragrance-free policy. Their request cited headaches, nausea, and inability to concentrate, all caused by overpowering fragrance use among some students and faculty. The students are waiting for the administration's decision.
  • Workers in the Portland, Ore., Bureau of Emergency Communications were recently banned from wearing fragrances under what has become one of the nation's first government workplace "fragrance-free" policies. Portland State University followed suit, and now similar programs are in place at Cecil College in Maryland."
I hope the general public will become aware of this issue, especially the increased exposure to chemical neurotoxins.  Also, all the chemicals in the soaps and laundry detergents are causing the fish in America's waterways to become hermaphrodites--this means the chemicals are raising estrogen levels.  This affects people too, causing man-boobs, estrogen dominance in women, and there are studies that also show soy milk can cause baby boys to become hermaphroditic.  So as well as exposing people to chemical neurotoxins, chemical fragrances are contributing to the increase of estrogen levels in people and animals.  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2uPwNM1-pw)

A Votre Sante (Here's To Your Health), Alix

Friday, December 20, 2013

Bowen Therapy for Fibro

I have been doing Bowen therapy (a specific type of massage) to reset my nervous system after being diagnosed with CFS/borderline fibro.  (See Dr. Edelberg's books The Triple Whammy Cure and Healing Fibromyalgia.)

After only one treatment my flu-like symptoms went away.  This in itself is huge.  Previously, for many years, when I got less than 9-10 hours of sleep I experienced all-over pain like the flu which was difficult.  Many days I needed 11-12 or more hours of sleep.  Now with Dr. Edelberg's help as well as getting Bowen Therapy, I need an average of 9, sometimes 10.  Over time the pain should be totally eliminated as well as the fatigue.

Bowen therapy resets the nervous system, and I go once a month, with no kind of massage in between due to the nervous system working on itself the whole month.

The day after Bowen therapy, my fascia barks at me, and I experience some heightened pain (only a pain scale of 7-8)--but then it subsides the next day.  The therapy has worked overall, and is reducing the pain in my upper back, lower back and legs that I have had for many years in the fascia (which then pinches the nerves.)

Yoga, stretching, and working out cause flair ups in pain, so although I work out and stretch some, I have to take it easy.  Right now, for me, walking articulates the muscles in the spine and gives a slight twist to the back, warming up the fascia and thereby loosening it.

The best way for me to eliminate pain is heat.  As much as I can comfortably take, and that loosens up the fascia in a specific area. 

I wish there were more dialogue on how to reduce pain, but since millions of women (according to Dr. Oz) currently have fibro but aren't diagnosed, there is still a lot of dialogue that hasn't taken place.  Not everybody wants to or needs to take pain killers, and some people are over medicated depending on the severity of their fibro.

I understand that the "day-after-effect" in Bowen may be too painful for some people who have severe fibro, but have also read that it has miraculously helped many.  For me, having borderline fibro, or as I was told by Dr. E, "being on the foothills of fibro," has not been easy.  For those with severe fibro, I wish you the absolute best, and hope you can find answers in Dr. Edelberg's books or with Bowen therapy.

A Votre Sante (Here's To Your Health), Alix

Friday, October 4, 2013

Big Troubles Associated with Antidepressants

I love Dr. Mercola's newsletter in part because he is so outspoken and unafraid of making waves.  (I also think he has good lawyers because he has been sued by pharma companies who like to keep a lid on this kind of perspective!)

This is a short excerpt from a Mercola article:
  • Antidepressant-induced violence and homicide is an international problem, but it is particularly apparent in the US due to the widespread use (and misuse) of these drugs
  • 31 commonly-prescribed drugs are disproportionately associated with cases of violent acts. Five of the top 10 most violence-inducing drugs are antidepressants. Commonly used ADHD drugs are also on the list
  • Research has found that one in every 250 subjects taking Paxil or Prozac were involved in a violent episode. In a study group of 25,000 people, this included 31 assaults and one homicide
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/10/03/antidepressant-side-effects.aspx?e_cid=20131003Z1_DNL_art_1&utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20131003Z1

....It is interesting to me that St. John's Wort is largely prescribed in Europe for depression and seems to be so uncommon here as far as prescriptions go.  Also the work of Daniel Amen breaks depression down into many types, some of them are not due to low serotonin.  Interestingly there is a simple urine test for a neurotransmitter profile ($90 without insurance)--but how many doctors don't give it to their patients before prescribing antidepressants.  

What if that patient is sleeping a lot and low energy becasue of adrenal fatigue or sub clinical low thyroid (low normal range, which some doctors think is too low) and not depression?  What if the neurotransmitter test is not given, and the patient has HIGH serotonin (see the work of Ray Peat)--if a patient is high in serotonin the absolute last thing they need (according to Ray) is to boost their serotonin.  This is why I am glad for people like Mercola who offer a cautionary perspective on antidepressants.


A Votre Sante, (Here's To Your Health,)  Alix

Segmented Sleep Normal?

I found this very interesting article about sleep online (here is a slightly abbreviated version.)

 
The myth of the eight-hour sleep

By Stephanie Hegarty BBC World Service

We often worry about lying awake in the middle of the night - but it could be good for you. A growing body of evidence from both science and history suggests that the eight-hour sleep may be unnatural.

In the early 1990s, psychiatrist Thomas Wehr conducted an experiment in which a group of people were plunged into darkness for 14 hours every day for a month.

It took some time for their sleep to regulate but by the fourth week the subjects had settled into a very distinct sleeping pattern. They slept first for four hours, then woke for one or two hours before falling into a second four-hour sleep.

Though sleep scientists were impressed by the study, among the general public the idea that we must sleep for eight consecutive hours persists.

In 2001, historian Roger Ekirch of Virginia Tech published a seminal paper, drawn from 16 years of research, revealing a wealth of historical evidence that humans used to sleep in two distinct chunks.

His book At Day's Close: Night in Times Past, published four years later, unearths more than 500 references to a segmented sleeping pattern - in diaries, court records, medical books and literature, from Homer's Odyssey to an anthropological account of modern tribes in Nigeria.

Much like the experience of Wehr's subjects, these references describe a first sleep which began about two hours after dusk, followed by waking period of one or two hours and then a second sleep.

"It's not just the number of references - it is the way they refer to it, as if it was common knowledge," Ekirch says.

During this waking period people were quite active. They often got up, went to the toilet or smoked tobacco and some even visited neighbours. Most people stayed in bed, read, wrote and often prayed. Countless prayer manuals from the late 15th Century offered special prayers for the hours in between sleeps.

[The article gives examples of segmented sleep references from literature]

  • "He knew this, even in the horror with which he started from his first sleep, and threw up the window to dispel it by the presence of some object, beyond the room, which had not been, as it were, the witness of his dream." Charles Dickens, Barnaby Rudge (1840)
  • "Don Quixote followed nature, and being satisfied with his first sleep, did not solicit more. As for Sancho, he never wanted a second, for the first lasted him from night to morning." Miguel Cervantes, Don Quixote (1615)
  • "And at the wakening of your first sleepe You shall have a hott drinke made, And at the wakening of your next sleepe Your sorrowes will have a slake." Early English ballad, Old Robin of Portingale
  • The Tiv tribe in Nigeria employ the terms "first sleep" and "second sleep" to refer to specific periods of the night

And these hours weren't entirely solitary - people often chatted to bed-fellows or had sex.

A doctor's manual from 16th Century France even advised couples that the best time to conceive was not at the end of a long day's labour but "after the first sleep", when "they have more enjoyment" and "do it better".

Ekirch found that references to the first and second sleep started to disappear during the late 17th Century. This started among the urban upper classes in northern Europe and over the course of the next 200 years filtered down to the rest of Western society.

By the 1920s the idea of a first and second sleep had receded entirely from our social consciousness.

He attributes the initial shift to improvements in street lighting, domestic lighting and a surge in coffee houses - which were sometimes open all night. As the night became a place for legitimate activity and as that activity increased, the length of time people could dedicate to rest dwindled.

In his new book, Evening's Empire, historian Craig Koslofsky puts forward an account of how this happened.

"Associations with night before the 17th Century were not good," he says. The night was a place populated by people of disrepute - criminals, prostitutes and drunks.

"Even the wealthy, who could afford candlelight, had better things to spend their money on. There was no prestige or social value associated with staying up all night."


That changed in the wake of the Reformation and the counter-Reformation. Protestants and Catholics became accustomed to holding secret services at night, during periods of persecution. If earlier the night had belonged to reprobates, now respectable people became accustomed to exploiting the hours of darkness.

This trend migrated to the social sphere too, but only for those who could afford to live by candlelight. With the advent of street lighting, however, socialising at night began to filter down through the classes.

In 1667, Paris became the first city in the world to light its streets, using wax candles in glass lamps. It was followed by Lille in the same year and Amsterdam two years later, where a much more efficient oil-powered lamp was developed.

London didn't join their ranks until 1684 but by the end of the century, more than 50 of Europe's major towns and cities were lit at night.

Night became fashionable and spending hours lying in bed was considered a waste of time.

"People were becoming increasingly time-conscious and sensitive to efficiency, certainly before the 19th Century," says Roger Ekirch. "But the industrial revolution intensified that attitude by leaps and bounds."

Strong evidence of this shifting attitude is contained in a medical journal from 1829 which urged parents to force their children out of a pattern of first and second sleep.

A small city like Leipzig in central Germany employed 100 men to tend to 700 lamps.

"If no disease or accident there intervene, they will need no further repose than that obtained in their first sleep, which custom will have caused to terminate by itself just at the usual hour.

"And then, if they turn upon their ear to take a second nap, they will be taught to look upon it as an intemperance not at all redounding to their credit."

Today, most people seem to have adapted quite well to the eight-hour sleep, but Ekirch believes many sleeping problems may have roots in the human body's natural preference for segmented sleep as well as the ubiquity of artificial light.

This could be the root of a condition called sleep maintenance insomnia, where people wake during the night and have trouble getting back to sleep, he suggests.

The condition first appears in literature at the end of the 19th Century, at the same time as accounts of segmented sleep disappear.

"For most of evolution we slept a certain way," says sleep psychologist Gregg Jacobs. "Waking up during the night is part of normal human physiology."

The idea that we must sleep in a consolidated block could be damaging, he says, if it makes people who wake up at night anxious, as this anxiety can itself prohibit sleeps and is likely to seep into waking life too.

Every 60-100 minutes we go through a cycle of four stages of sleep

  • Stage 1 is a drowsy, relaxed state between being awake and sleeping - breathing slows, muscles relax, heart rate drops
  • Stage 2 is slightly deeper sleep - you may feel awake and this means that, on many nights, you may be asleep and not know it
  • Stage 3 and Stage 4, or Deep Sleep - it is very hard to wake up from Deep Sleep because this is when there is the lowest amount of activity in your body
  • After Deep Sleep, we go back to Stage 2 for a few minutes, and then enter Dream Sleep - also called REM (rapid eye movement) sleep - which, as its name suggests, is when you dream

In a full sleep cycle, a person goes through all the stages of sleep from one to four, then back down through stages three and two, before entering dream sleep

Russell Foster, a professor of circadian [body clock] neuroscience at Oxford, shares this point of view.

"Many people wake up at night and panic," he says. "I tell them that what they are experiencing is a throwback to the bi-modal sleep pattern."

But the majority of doctors still fail to acknowledge that a consolidated eight-hour sleep may be unnatural.

"Over 30% of the medical problems that doctors are faced with stem directly or indirectly from sleep. But sleep has been ignored in medical training and there are very few centres where sleep is studied," he says.

Jacobs suggests that the waking period between sleeps, when people were forced into periods of rest and relaxation, could have played an important part in the human capacity to regulate stress naturally.

In many historic accounts, Ekirch found that people used the time to meditate on their dreams.

"Today we spend less time doing those things," says Dr Jacobs. "It's not a coincidence that, in modern life, the number of people who report anxiety, stress, depression, alcoholism and drug abuse has gone up."

So the next time you wake up in the middle of the night, think of your pre-industrial ancestors and relax. Lying awake could be good for you.
 
......Very interesting article, I had never heard of segmented sleep until I read this.
 
A Votre Sante (Here's To Your Health,) Alix

 

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Watch out for GM corn

Here is a summary of the latest Dr. Mercola newsletter about glycophospate/Roundup and GM foods.

The following excerpt is from Mercola.com:
  • Research shows glyphosate is toxic to water fleas at extraordinarily low levels, well within the levels expected to be found in the environment. These findings throw serious doubt on glyphosate’s safety
  • Previous research has shown that Roundup is toxic to human DNA even when diluted to concentrations 450-fold lower than used in agricultural applications
  • “Inactive” ingredients such as solvents, preservatives, and surfactants contribute to toxicity in a synergistic manner, and ethoxylated adjuvants in glyphosate-based herbicides have been found to be “active principles of human cell toxicity”
  • Cell damage and even cell death can occur at the residual levels found on Roundup-treated food crops, as well as lawns and gardens where Roundup is applied for weed control
  • Liver, embryonic and placental cell lines are adversely affected by glyphosate at doses as low as 1 ppm. GM corn can contain as much as 13 ppm of glyphosate, and Americans eat an average of 193 lbs of GM foods annually
Dr. Mercola is great at speaking out against GM foods and compiling research to keep the public updated. Check out his free newsletter at Mercola.com.

A Votre Sante (Here's To Your Health,) Alix
UA-77002201-1